CCT205+Lab3*


 * Lab 3**

The iPad is an interesting product, but I would not consider it revolutionary.

Recently, the most impressive advancements in computing technology have been those that incorporate touch or tilt features. However, these have only been applied to small mobile devices. Apple’s idea to apply these features to a larger device is definitely a step in the right direction. The larger size of the iPad allows for a whole new level of touch and tilt interaction. While the iPad’s new touch and tilt capabilities are extremely impressive, the iPad is still lacking to qualify as revolutionary.

The reason I do not consider the iPad revolutionary is because it is limited in terms of functionality. Yes, you can use it to do many interesting things like read books, listen to music, view pictures, watch movies, and play video games, but what all of this amounts to is just a really cool toy. The fact that the iPad is only capable of single-tasking is already more than enough evidence that this device is lacking for any sort of practical usage. Many reviewers are “hating” on the iPad and its lack of functionality because they are comparing it to either a laptop or a computer when evaluating its worth. It is unfair to compare the iPad to a laptop or a computer because that is simply not what it is. The iPad is essentially a large, enhanced version of the iPhone, and for what it is, I think it makes a great product. However, what I believe many people were hoping for (including myself) was not just a bigger and better iPhone, but a real computer that could put the iPad’s new touch and tilt technology to more practical use. Once a product is released that can maintain the functions of a computer as well as incorporate the same level of touch and tilt technology, then I will believe that we have something revolutionary.

Kyle Martin Manoza